Viruses (Feb 2022)

Comparative Investigation of Methods for Analysis of SARS-CoV-2-Spike-Specific Antisera

  • Marie-Luise Herrlein,
  • Sascha Hein,
  • Tobias Zahn,
  • Ines Mhedhbi,
  • Jan Raupach,
  • Younes Husria,
  • Nuka Ivalu Benz,
  • Jonathan Eisert,
  • Daniela Bender,
  • Vanessa Haberger,
  • Florian D. Hastert,
  • Lisa Henss,
  • Barbara S. Schnierle,
  • Julia C. Stingl,
  • Michael Dreher,
  • Eberhard Hildt

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/v14020410
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 2
p. 410

Abstract

Read online

In light of an increasing number of vaccinated and convalescent individuals, there is a major need for the development of robust methods for the quantification of neutralizing antibodies; although, a defined correlate of protection is still missing. Sera from hospitalized COVID-19 patients suffering or not suffering from acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) were comparatively analyzed by plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) and pseudotype-based neutralization assays to quantify their neutralizing capacity. The two neutralization assays showed comparable data. In case of the non-ARDS sera, there was a distinct correlation between the data from the neutralization assays on the one hand, and enzyme-linked immune sorbent assay (ELISA), as well as biophysical analyses, on the other hand. As such, surface plasmon resonance (SPR)-based assays for quantification of binding antibodies or analysis of the stability of the antigen–antibody interaction and inhibition of syncytium formation, determined by cell fusion assays, were performed. In the case of ARDS sera, which are characterized by a significantly higher fraction of RBD-binding IgA antibodies, there is a clear correlation between the neutralization assays and the ELISA data. In contrast to this, a less clear correlation between the biophysical analyses on the one hand and ELISAs and neutralization assays on the other hand was observed, which might be explained by the heterogeneity of the antibodies. To conclude, for less complex immune sera—as in cases of non-ARDS sera—combinations of titer quantification by ELISA with inhibition of syncytium formation, SPR-based analysis of antibody binding, determination of the stability of the antigen–antibody complex, and competition of the RBD-ACE2 binding represent alternatives to the classic PRNT for analysis of the neutralizing potential of SARS-CoV-2-specific sera, without the requirement for a BSL3 facility.

Keywords