Cancer Medicine (Sep 2023)

Effect of butyrate‐producing enterobacteria on advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treatment with atezolizumab and bevacizumab

  • Kazuhiro Nouso,
  • Shohei Shiota,
  • Rio Fujita,
  • Akiko Wakuta,
  • Kazuya Kariyama,
  • Atsushi Hiraoka,
  • Masanori Atsukawa,
  • Joji Tani,
  • Toshifumi Tada,
  • Shinichiro Nakamura,
  • Kazuto Tajiri,
  • Masaki Kaibori,
  • Masashi Hirooka,
  • Ei Itobayashi,
  • Satoru Kakizaki,
  • Atsushi Naganuma,
  • Toru Ishikawa,
  • Takeshi Hatanaka,
  • Shinya Fukunishi,
  • Kunihiko Tsuji,
  • Kazuhito Kawata,
  • Koichi Takaguchi,
  • Akemi Tsutsui,
  • Chikara Ogawa,
  • Hironori Ochi,
  • Yutaka Yata,
  • Hidekatsu Kuroda,
  • Hiroko Iijima,
  • Tomomitsu Matono,
  • Noritomo Shimada,
  • Satoshi Yasuda,
  • Hidenori Toyoda,
  • Takashi Kumada,
  • the Real‐life Practice Experts for HCC (RELPEC) Study Group and HCC 48 Group (hepatocellular carcinoma experts from 48 clinics in Japan)

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6416
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 17
pp. 17849 – 17855

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Aim Multiple studies have revealed the correlation between gut microbiome and the response to checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) in patients with cancer, and oral administration of butyrate‐producing enterobacteria has been reported to enhance the efficacy of CPIs. However, the effects of enterobacteria on patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are not well understood. Methods In this retrospective multicenter study, we enrolled 747 patients with advanced HCC, treated with atezolizumab and bevacizumab combination therapy. Tumor response, survival, and adverse effects were compared between 99 patients who ingested drugs containing butyric acid‐producing enterobacteria (butyric acid group) and the remaining patients (control group). Results Objective response and disease control rates in butyric acid group (29.7% and 77.8%, respectively) were higher than those in the control group (26.4% and 72.7%, respectively). However, the differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.543 and p = 0.222, respectively). No difference in median survival time was observed between the two groups (20.0 months and 21.4 months, respectively; p = 0.789), even after matching the backgrounds of the patients with propensity scores (p = 0.714). No adverse effects occurred upon the administration of butyrate‐producing bacteria. However, proteinuria (41.4% vs. 30.9%; p = 0.041), fever (17.2% vs. 10.2%, p = 0.036), and diarrhea (15.2% vs. 6.2%; p = 0.001) occurred more frequently in the butyric acid group. Conclusion Butyrate‐producing bacteria does not enhance the efficacy of atezolizumab–bevacizumab combination therapy in patients with HCC.

Keywords