Archives of Public Health (May 2024)

Fuzzy cognitive mapping in participatory research and decision making: a practice review

  • Iván Sarmiento,
  • Anne Cockcroft,
  • Anna Dion,
  • Loubna Belaid,
  • Hilah Silver,
  • Katherine Pizarro,
  • Juan Pimentel,
  • Elyse Tratt,
  • Lashanda Skerritt,
  • Mona Z. Ghadirian,
  • Marie-Catherine Gagnon-Dufresne,
  • Neil Andersson

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-024-01303-7
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 82, no. 1
pp. 1 – 15

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Fuzzy cognitive mapping (FCM) is a graphic technique to describe causal understanding in a wide range of applications. This practice review summarises the experience of a group of participatory research specialists and trainees who used FCM to include stakeholder views in addressing health challenges. From a meeting of the research group, this practice review reports 25 experiences with FCM in nine countries between 2016 and 2023. Results The methods, challenges and adjustments focus on participatory research practice. FCM portrayed multiple sources of knowledge: stakeholder knowledge, systematic reviews of literature, and survey data. Methodological advances included techniques to contrast and combine maps from different sources using Bayesian procedures, protocols to enhance the quality of data collection, and tools to facilitate analysis. Summary graphs communicating FCM findings sacrificed detail but facilitated stakeholder discussion of the most important relationships. We used maps not as predictive models but to surface and share perspectives of how change could happen and to inform dialogue. Analysis included simple manual techniques and sophisticated computer-based solutions. A wide range of experience in initiating, drawing, analysing, and communicating the maps illustrates FCM flexibility for different contexts and skill bases. Conclusions A strong core procedure can contribute to more robust applications of the technique while adapting FCM for different research settings. Decision-making often involves choices between plausible interventions in a context of uncertainty and multiple possible answers to the same question. FCM offers systematic and traceable ways to document, contrast and sometimes to combine perspectives, incorporating stakeholder experience and causal models to inform decision-making. Different depths of FCM analysis open opportunities for applying the technique in skill-limited settings.

Keywords