Using protein language models for protein interaction hot spot prediction with limited data

Abstract

Abstract Background Protein language models, inspired by the success of large language models in deciphering human language, have emerged as powerful tools for unraveling the intricate code of life inscribed within protein sequences. They have gained significant attention for their promising applications across various areas, including the sequence-based prediction of secondary and tertiary protein structure, the discovery of new functional protein sequences/folds, and the assessment of mutational impact on protein fitness. However, their utility in learning to predict protein residue properties based on scant datasets, such as protein–protein interaction (PPI)-hotspots whose mutations significantly impair PPIs, remained unclear. Here, we explore the feasibility of using protein language-learned representations as features for machine learning to predict PPI-hotspots using a dataset containing 414 experimentally confirmed PPI-hotspots and 504 PPI-nonhot spots. Results Our findings showcase the capacity of unsupervised learning with protein language models in capturing critical functional attributes of protein residues derived from the evolutionary information encoded within amino acid sequences. We show that methods relying on protein language models can compete with methods employing sequence and structure-based features to predict PPI-hotspots from the free protein structure. We observed an optimal number of features for model precision, suggesting a balance between information and overfitting. Conclusions This study underscores the potential of transformer-based protein language models to extract critical knowledge from sparse datasets, exemplified here by the challenging realm of predicting PPI-hotspots. These models offer a cost-effective and time-efficient alternative to traditional experimental methods for predicting certain residue properties. However, the challenge of explaining why specific features are important for determining certain residue properties remains.

Keywords

• Protein language models
• ESM-2
• Protein–protein interaction
• PPI-hotspot
• Small datasets
• Feature selection