International Journal of Neonatal Screening (Feb 2018)

Are We Ready for Fragile X Newborn Screening Testing?—Lessons Learnt from a Feasibility Study

  • Tiffany Wotton,
  • Veronica Wiley,
  • Bruce Bennetts,
  • Louise Christie,
  • Bridget Wilcken,
  • Gemma Jenkins,
  • Carolyn Rogers,
  • Jackie Boyle,
  • Michael Field

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns4010009
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 4, no. 1
p. 9

Abstract

Read online

Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the most prevalent heritable cause of cognitive impairment but is not yet included in a newborn screening (NBS) program within Australia. This paper aims to assess the feasibility and reliability of population screening for FXS using a pilot study in one hospital. A total of 1971 mothers consented for 2000 newborns to be tested using routine NBS dried blood spot samples. DNA was extracted and a modified PCR assay with a chimeric CGG primer was used to detect fragile X alleles in both males and females in the normal, premutation, and full mutation ranges. A routine PCR-based fragile X assay was run in parallel to validate the chimeric primer assay. Babies with CGG repeat number ≥59 were referred for family studies. One thousand nine hundred and ninety NBS samples had a CGG repeat number less than 55 (1986 < 50); 10 had premutation alleles >54 CGG repeats (1/123 females and 1/507 males). There was complete concordance between the two PCR-based assays. A recent review revealed no clinically identified cases in the cohort up to 5 years later. The cost per test was $AUD19. Fragile X status can be determined on routine NBS samples using the chimeric primer assay. However, whilst this assay may not be considered cost-effective for population screening, it could be considered as a second-tier assay to a developed immunoassay for fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP).

Keywords