Agronomy (Aug 2024)

Intelligent Rice Field Weed Control in Precision Agriculture: From Weed Recognition to Variable Rate Spraying

  • Zhonghui Guo,
  • Dongdong Cai,
  • Juchi Bai,
  • Tongyu Xu,
  • Fenghua Yu

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14081702
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 8
p. 1702

Abstract

Read online

A precision agriculture approach that uses drones for crop protection and variable rate application has become the main method of rice weed control, but it suffers from excessive spraying issues, which can pollute soil and water environments and harm ecosystems. This study proposes a method to generate variable spray prescription maps based on the actual distribution of weeds in rice fields and utilize DJI plant protection UAVs to perform automatic variable spraying operations according to the prescription maps, achieving precise pesticide application. We first construct the YOLOv8n DT model by transferring the “knowledge features” learned by the larger YOLOv8l model with strong feature extraction capabilities to the smaller YOLOv8n model through knowledge distillation. We use this model to identify weeds in the field and generate an actual distribution map of rice field weeds based on the recognition results. The number of weeds in each experimental plot is counted, and the specific amount of pesticide for each plot is determined based on the amount of weeds and the spraying strategy proposed in this study. Variable spray prescription maps are then generated accordingly. DJI plant protection UAVs are used to perform automatic variable spraying operations based on prescription maps. Water-sensitive papers are used to collect droplets during the automatic variable operation process of UAVs, and the variable spraying effect is evaluated through droplet analysis. YOLOv8n-DT improved the accuracy of the model by 3.1% while keeping the model parameters constant, and the accuracy of identifying weeds in rice fields reached 0.82, which is close to the accuracy of the teacher network. Compared to the traditional extensive spraying method, the approach in this study saves approximately 15.28% of herbicides. This study demonstrates a complete workflow from UAV image acquisition to the evaluation of the variable spraying effect of plant protection UAVs. The method proposed in this research may provide an effective solution to balance the use of chemical herbicides and protect ecological safety.

Keywords