Infrastructures (Nov 2024)

Design Principles to Reduce Vehicle Pocketing at Guardrail-to-Concrete Barrier Transitions

  • Desiree Kofler,
  • Ernst Tomasch,
  • Christian Mader,
  • Marco Jiraut,
  • Alexander Barnaš,
  • Olivier Jantscher,
  • Johann Horvatits,
  • Karl Gragger

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures9110199
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9, no. 11
p. 199

Abstract

Read online

Road restraint systems (RRSs) on European roads are provided by several manufacturers and, hence, lead to differences in geometry, material, and mode of operation. Focusing on the combination of soft steel RRSs with relatively stiffer concrete RRSs, it is vital to consider the potentially critical deformation kinematics during vehicle impacts, such as vehicle pocketing. Since a statutory test procedure was not introduced until mid-2024, much of the transition construction (TC) on Austrian roads has remained untested. Knowledge of the design features to be implemented during the refurbishment of such TCs is of great interest. The main focus of this study was to derive constructive measures (CMs) that increase traffic safety and are applicable to various TCs already installed on roads. The first step involved deriving design principles whose implementations in TCs reduce the risk of critical vehicle or RRS behavior. Based on finite element simulations, the functionality of a TC featuring all derived design principles was examined. The effect of each individual CM was analyzed in a parameter study. The results from a TB61 impact simulation on the derived TC showed the effectiveness of CMs, achieving smooth vehicle redirection. Vehicle pocketing was limited to a minimum, and neither penetration of the TC nor rollover of the vehicle was observed. The analysis of the influence of each CM indicated positive, and in some cases, negative effects. The working width was mainly positively influenced by the compaction of the posts, an additional steel bar, and the chamfering of the first concrete element. A rather diverse picture is drawn regarding the influence on the tensile forces in the guardrails. Some CMs had both positive and negative effects on the distribution of forces in the upper and lower guardrails. Nevertheless, all CMs had positive effects on the tensile forces in the coupling. The chamfering of the first concrete element was the most effective measure to prevent vehicle pocketing. However, through the combination of all CMs, the positive effects predominated, ensuring the functionality of the TC as a whole. This study provides basic insights into the effectiveness of constructive measures, which can serve as a reference for the renovation of in-service TCs or in the development phase of new TCs to be certified.

Keywords