Cancers (Jun 2023)

Oncologic Outcomes of Lymph Node Dissection at Salvage Radical Prostatectomy

  • Felix Preisser,
  • Reha-Baris Incesu,
  • Pawel Rajwa,
  • Marcin Chlosta,
  • Mohamed Ahmed,
  • Andre Luis Abreu,
  • Giovanni Cacciamani,
  • Luis Ribeiro,
  • Alexander Kretschmer,
  • Thilo Westhofen,
  • Joseph A. Smith,
  • Markus Graefen,
  • Giorgio Calleris,
  • Yannic Raskin,
  • Paolo Gontero,
  • Steven Joniau,
  • Rafael Sanchez-Salas,
  • Shahrokh F. Shariat,
  • Inderbir Gill,
  • Robert Jeffrey Karnes,
  • Paul Cathcart,
  • Henk Van Der Poel,
  • Giancarlo Marra,
  • Derya Tilki

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15123123
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15, no. 12
p. 3123

Abstract

Read online

Background: Lymph node invasion (LNI) represents a poor prognostic factor after primary radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer (PCa). However, the impact of LNI on oncologic outcomes in salvage radical prostatectomy (SRP) patients is unknown. Objective: To investigate the impact of lymph node dissection (LND) and pathological lymph node status (pNX vs. pN0 vs. pN1) on long-term oncologic outcomes of SRP patients. Patients and methods: Patients who underwent SRP for recurrent PCa between 2000 and 2021 were identified from 12 high-volume centers. Kaplan–Meier analyses and multivariable Cox regression models were used. Endpoints were biochemical recurrence (BCR), overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Results: Of 853 SRP patients, 87% (n = 727) underwent LND, and 21% (n = 151) harbored LNI. The median follow-up was 27 months. The mean number of removed lymph nodes was 13 in the LND cohort. At 72 months after SRP, BCR-free survival was 54% vs. 47% vs. 7.2% for patients with pNX vs. pN0 vs. pN1 (p p p = 0.02) for patients with pNX vs. pN0 vs. pN1, respectively. In multivariable Cox regression analyses, pN1 status was independently associated with BCR (HR: 1.77, p p < 0.001). Conclusions: In SRP patients, LNI represents an independent poor prognostic factor. However, the oncologic benefit of LND in SRP remains debatable. These findings underline the need for a cautious LND indication in SRP patients as well as strict postoperative monitoring of SRP patients with LNI.

Keywords