Cancer Medicine (Aug 2024)

Trends in HPV‐associated cancer incidence in Texas medically underserved regions

  • Thao N. Hoang,
  • Abbey B. Berenson,
  • Yong Shan,
  • Fangjian Guo,
  • Victor Adekanmbi,
  • Christine Hsu,
  • Xiaoying Yu,
  • Yong‐Fang Kuo

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.70133
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 16
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background While cervical cancer incidence rates (IR) in the United States have dropped in the last 20 years, non‐cervical human papillomavirus (HPV) associated cancers increased. Many people in Texas (TX) live in medically underserved areas and have higher risk of developing HPV‐associated cancers. Since previous studies of these regions focused on cervical cancer, we included other HPV‐associated cancers in our analysis of IR in East TX and the TX‐Mexico Border compared to other TX regions. Methods Cancer data from 2006 to 2019 were obtained from the TX Cancer Registry. Cases of HPV‐associated cervical, vaginal, vulvar, penile, anal, and oropharyngeal cancers and corresponding patient‐level demographic data were included. We calculated IR per 100,000 and drew heat maps to visualize cancer IR by county. To control potential confounders, we added county‐level risk factors: rates for smoking, excessive drinking, obesity, STIs, primary care provider availability and dentist availability, from the County Health Rankings and Roadmaps program. We reported IRs by region and time and estimated unadjusted and adjusted risk ratio (RR) for association of each type of cancer and region. Lastly, we created adjusted models for each cancer by period to see time trends of regional differences. Results Risk of anal, cervical, and oropharyngeal cancer was lower at parts of the Border than in the rest of TX in the adjusted model. We also observed increasing anal and oropharyngeal cancer risk and decreasing cervical and vaginal cancer risk over time. Conclusion Patient sociodemographics, behavioral risk factors, and access to care may contribute to some observed differences in cancer IR across regions. This indicates that targeted prevention efforts towards these regions, especially in low socioeconomic status communities, may benefit future generations.

Keywords