پژوهشهای آبخیزداری (Mar 2024)
Investigating Spatial Changes in Nitrate and Arsenic in Groundwater of the Jiroft Watershed
Abstract
Introduction and GoalAwareness of spatial variations in groundwater quality parameters is an important tool for identifying the capacity of the region and land management. Jiroft is located on an arsenic belt in the country and considering the effect that arsenic has on underground water and the carcinogenic nature of this element, analysis of this element is very important. Moreover, most rural regions of Jiroft use the well water for drinking. Therefore, the analysis of groundwater in this region appears to be very important for drinking purpose.Materials and MethodsUsing geostatistical methods, the present study attempted to analyze the spatial variation of nitrate, arsenic, manganese, and all dissolved solid parameters in the groundwater of the Jiroft watershed during 2019. For this purpose, water from 36 agricultural wells and wells used for drinking in villages, as well as urban drinking water samples, were sampled in three replicates. The geostatistical methods used for zoning the above parameters include ordinary kriging (OK), simple kriging (SK), radial basis function (RBF), and inverse distance weighting (IDW) with different powers. Geostatistical methods were evaluated using the mutual evaluation technique applying the root mean square error (RMSE) and mean bias error (MBE) criteria between the actual and estimated data.Results and DiscussionIn this research, the spatial changes of nitrate, arsenic, manganese and total solids dissolved in groundwater in the Jiroft watershed were analyzed using the evaluation criteria ranking results showed that the estimation of arsenic and TDS with the spherical model of the simple kriging method had the least error and the estimation of nitrate and manganese with the radial basis function (RBF) method had the lowest error. The study showed that the spatial correlation of the quality metric of the Jiroft watershed is very high. Therefore, the error of the semivariable model of the measured data of arsenic with a partial effect of 0.00025 and a range of influence of 36.7 km was 38.4%, whereas the error of the semivariable model of nitrate with a partial effect of 0.3 and a range of influence of 28.5% was 4.9%. In the Jiroft watershed, the concentration of arsenic in the water of other areas was much higher than the permissible amount for drinking based on standard 1051 of the Iranian Institute of Standards and Industrial Research except for urban water. In addition, the concentration of nitrate in all the samples was lower than the permissible amount for drinking water, so there is no obstacle to its use.
Keywords
