PLoS ONE (Jan 2022)

Relative changes in brain and kidney biomarkers with Exertional Heat Illness during a cool weather marathon.

  • Michael J Stacey,
  • Neil E Hill,
  • Iain T Parsons,
  • Jenny Wallace,
  • Natalie Taylor,
  • Rachael Grimaldi,
  • Nishma Shah,
  • Anna Marshall,
  • Carol House,
  • John P O'Hara,
  • Stephen J Brett,
  • David R Woods

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263873
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 17, no. 2
p. e0263873

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundMedical personnel may find it challenging to distinguish severe Exertional Heat Illness (EHI), with attendant risks of organ-injury and longer-term sequalae, from lesser forms of incapacity associated with strenuous physical exertion. Early evidence for injury at point-of-incapacity could aid the development and application of targeted interventions to improve outcomes. We aimed to investigate whether biomarker surrogates for end-organ damage sampled at point-of-care (POC) could discriminate EHI versus successful marathon performance.MethodsEight runners diagnosed as EHI cases upon reception to medical treatment facilities and 30 successful finishers of the same cool weather marathon (ambient temperature 8 rising to 12 ºC) were recruited. Emerging clinical markers associated with injury affecting the brain (neuron specific enolase, NSE; S100 calcium-binding protein B, S100β) and renal system (cystatin C, cysC; kidney-injury molecule-1, KIM-1; neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, NGAL), plus copeptin as a surrogate for fluid-regulatory stress, were sampled in blood upon marathon collapse/completion, as well as beforehand at rest (successful finishers only).ResultsVersus successful finishers, EHI showed significantly higher NSE (10.33 [6.37, 20.00] vs. 3.17 [2.71, 3.92] ug.L-1, PConclusionsAs novel biomarker candidates for EHI outcomes in cool-weather endurance exercise, early elevations in NSE and copeptin provided sufficient discrimination to suggest utility at point-of-incapacity. Further investigation is warranted in patients exposed to greater thermal insult, followed up over a more extended period.