Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology (Jan 2008)

Phase II Study of S-1 Monotherapy as a First-line, Combination Therapy of S-1 plus Cisplatin as a Second-line, and Weekly Paclitaxel Monotherapy as a Third-line Therapy in Patients with Advanced Gastric Carcinoma

  • Yasushi Rino M.D.,
  • Norio Yukawa,
  • Nobuyuki Wada,
  • Makoto Suzuki,
  • Hitoshi Murakami,
  • Takanobu Yamada,
  • Hirotaka Nakayama,
  • Naoto Yamamoto,
  • Tsutomu Sato,
  • Roppei Yamada,
  • Takashi Ohshima,
  • Munetaka Masuda,
  • Toshio Imada

DOI
https://doi.org/10.4137/CMO.S610
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 2

Abstract

Read online

Background We conducted a pilot phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of S-1 as a first-line, S-1 plus cisplatin as a second-line, and weekly paclitaxel as a third-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer. Patients and Methods Between 2002 and 2005, 19 patients were enrolled in this study. Chemotherapy consisted of either 60 mg/m 2 of S-1 for 4 weeks at 6 weeks interval, a combination of 60 mg/m 2 S-1 for 3 weeks and 60 mg/m 2 cisplatin on day 8 at 5 weeks interval, or 60 mg/m 2 paclitaxel at day 1, 8, 15, at 4 weeks interval. The regimen was repeated until the occurrence of unacceptable toxicities, disease progression, or patient refusal. The primary end point was the overall survival. Results The response rates were 33.3%, 12.5%, and 0% after the first, second, and third line chemotherapy, respectively. The mean overall survival time was 994 days. The median survival time could not be calculated because 12 out of 19 patients were still alive when the study was concluded. Regarding hematological toxicity, the major adverse effect was leukopenia, which reached grades 3–4 in all lines of chemotherapy investigated. In addition, regarding non-hematological toxicities, the major adverse effect was anorexia, which reached grade 3–4 in the second line chemotherapy, and no deaths were attributable to the adverse effects of the drugs. Conclusion This sequential therapy was an effective treatment for advanced gastric cancer with acceptable toxic side-effects. We considered this sequential therapy to be effective because of the smooth switch to the next regimen.