European Urology Open Science (Aug 2023)

Reliable Visualization of the Treatment Effect of Transperineal Focal Laser Ablation in Prostate Cancer Patients by Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound Imaging

  • Luigi A.M.J.G. van Riel,
  • Rob A.A. van Kollenburg,
  • Jan Erik Freund,
  • Mitra Almasian,
  • Auke Jager,
  • Marc R.W. Engelbrecht,
  • Ruth S. Smit,
  • Elise Bekers,
  • Jakko A. Nieuwenhuijzen,
  • Pim J. van Leeuwen,
  • Henk van der Poel,
  • Theo M. de Reijke,
  • Harrie P. Beerlage,
  • Jorg R. Oddens,
  • Daniel M. de Bruin

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 54
pp. 72 – 79

Abstract

Read online

Background: Transperineal focal laser ablation (TPLA) treatment for prostate cancer (PCa) is an experimental focal ablative therapy modality with low morbidity. However, a dosimetry model for TPLA is lacking. Objective: To determine (1) the three-dimensional (3D) histologically defined ablation zone of single- and multifiber TPLA treatment for PCa correlated with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and (2) a reliable imaging modality of ablation zone volumetry. Design, setting, and participants: This was a prospective, multicenter, and interventional phase I/II pilot study with an ablate-and-resect design. TPLA was performed in 12 patients with localized prostate cancer divided over four treatment regimens to evaluate potential variation in outcomes. Intervention: TPLA was performed approximately 4 wk prior to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in a daycare setting using local anesthesia. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Four weeks after TPLA, ablation zone volumetry was determined on prostate MRI and CEUS by delineation and segmentation into 3D models and correlated with whole-mount RARP histology using the Pearson correlation index. Results and limitations: Twelve office-based TPLA procedures were performed successfully under continuous transrectal ultrasound guidance using local perineal anesthesia. No serious adverse events occurred. A qualitative analysis showed a clear demarcation of the ablation zone on T2-weighted MRI, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and CEUS. On pathological evaluation, no remnant cancer was observed within the ablation zone. Ablation zone volumetry on CEUS and T2-weighted MRI compared with histology had a Pearson correlation index of r = 0.94 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74–0.99, p < 0.001) and r = 0.93 (95% CI 0.73–0.98, p < 0.001), respectively. Conclusions: CEUS and prostate MRI could reliably visualize TPLA ablative effects after minimally invasive PCa treatment with a high concordance with histopathological findings and showed no remnant cancer. Patient summary: The treatment effects of a novel minimally invasive ablation therapy device can reliably be visualized with radiological examinations. These results will improve planning and performance of future procedures.

Keywords