North American Spine Society Journal (Dec 2023)

Impact of pleural effusion at an early period after posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis on future pulmonary function and lung volume

  • Masahiro Ozaki, MD, PhD,
  • Satoshi Suzuki, MD, PhD,
  • Takehiro Michikawa, PhD,
  • Yohei Takahashi, MD, PhD,
  • Satoshi Nori, MD, PhD,
  • Osahiko Tsuji, MD, PhD,
  • Narihito Nagoshi, MD, PhD,
  • Mitsuru Yagi, MD, PhD,
  • Nobuyuki Fujita, MD, PhD,
  • Morio Matsumoto, MD, PhD,
  • Masaya Nakamura, MD, PhD,
  • Kota Watanabe, MD, PhD

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16
p. 100289

Abstract

Read online

Background: Posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) has a potential risk for postoperative pleural effusion. Although pleural effusion at an early period after PSF for AIS occurs with a relatively high frequency and occasionally requires some treatments, the impact of postoperative pleural effusion on future pulmonary function or lung volume (LV) has not been clarified to date. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of pleural effusion after PSF for AIS on the postoperative pulmonary function and LV. Methods: A total of 114 consecutive patients who underwent PSF for AIS followed up greater than 2 years at our institute were retrospectively reviewed. We evaluated postoperative pleural effusion by computed tomography (CT) at the 1-week follow-up and divided patients into the pleural effusion (PF) and non-pleural effusion (NP) groups. We investigated spirometry parameters recorded for testing included vital capacity (VC), forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1), %VC, and FEV1% and measured the LV using CT images and a workstation at baseline and 2 years after surgery. Results: A total of 87 (76.3%) patients with postoperative pleural effusion were identified, but all patients were asymptomatic and did not require additional treatment for postoperative pleural effusion. All pulmonary function parameters at the 2-year follow-up exhibited no significant differences between the two groups. Although preoperative left LV (1.21±0.30 L vs. 1.36±0.34 L; p=.022) and total LV (2.68±0.62 L vs. 2.99±0.73 L; p=.031) were significantly lower in the PF group than in the NP group, all postoperative LV parameters were similar between the two groups. Conclusions: Pleural effusion at an early period after PSF for AIS was a postoperative occurrence without an impact on future pulmonary function and LV.

Keywords