Ultrasonography (Mar 2024)

Advanced fibrosis leads to overestimation of steatosis with quantitative ultrasound in individuals without hepatic steatosis

  • Takashi Kumada,
  • Hidenori Toyoda,
  • Sadanobu Ogawa,
  • Tatsuya Gotoh,
  • Yasuaki Suzuki,
  • Kento Imajo,
  • Katsutoshi Sugimoto,
  • Tatsuya Kakegawa,
  • Hidekatsu Kuroda,
  • Yutaka Yasui,
  • Nobuharu Tamaki,
  • Masayuki Kurosaki,
  • Namiki Izumi,
  • Tomoyuki Akita,
  • Junko Tanaka,
  • Atsushi Nakajima

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14366/usg.23194
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 43, no. 2
pp. 121 – 131

Abstract

Read online

Purpose The effect of hepatic fibrosis stage on quantitative ultrasound based on the attenuation coefficient (AC) for liver lipid quantification is controversial. The objective of this study was to determine how the degree of fibrosis assessed by magnetic resonance (MR) elastography affects AC based on the ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter according to the grade of hepatic steatosis, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)–derived proton density fat fraction (MRI-derived PDFF) as the reference standard. Methods Between February 2020 and April 2021, 982 patients with chronic liver disease who underwent AC and MRI-derived PDFF measurement as well as MR elastography were enrolled. Multiple regression was used to investigate whether AC was affected by the degree of liver stiffness. Results AC increased as liver stiffness progressed in 344 patients without hepatic steatosis (P=0.009). In multivariable analysis, AC was positively correlated with skin-capsule distance (P<0.001), MR elastography value (P=0.037), and MRI-derived PDFF (P<0.001) in patients without hepatic steatosis. In 52 of 982 patients (5%), the correlation between AC and MRIderived PDFF fell outside the 95% confidence interval for the regression line slope. Patients with MRI-derived PDFF lower than their AC (n=36) had higher fibrosis-4 scores, albumin-bilirubin scores, and MR elastography values than patients with MRI-derived PDFF greater than their AC (n=16; P=0.018, P=0.001, and P=0.011, respectively). Conclusion AC is affected by liver fibrosis (MR elastography value ≥6.7 kPa) only in patients without hepatic steatosis (MRI-derived PDFF <5.2%). These values should be interpreted with caution in patients with advanced liver fibrosis.

Keywords