PLoS ONE (Jan 2018)

Effectiveness of physically ablative and pharmacological treatments for anal condyloma in HIV-infected men.

  • Sandra Vela,
  • Sebastian Videla,
  • Arelly Ornelas,
  • Boris Revollo,
  • Bonaventura Clotet,
  • Guillem Sirera,
  • Marta Piñol,
  • Francesc García-Cuyás

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199033
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 8
p. e0199033

Abstract

Read online

BACKGROUND:There is limited information on the effectiveness of available treatments for anal condyloma acuminata in HIV-1-infected men. AIM:To provide data on the effectiveness of electrosurgical excision, infrared coagulation and pharmacological (imiquimod) treatments for anal condyloma acuminata (peri-anal and/or intra-anal) in HIV-1-infected men based on authors' practice. METHODS:Single-center, retrospective descriptive analysis of HIV-1-infected men, 18 years or older treated for anal condyloma acuminata. Standard treatments were offered: electrosurgery excision, infrared coagulation and topical imiquimod. Effectiveness was evaluated by the recurrence rate at 1 year after treatment. Recurrence was defined as any anal condyloma acuminata diagnosed after 3 months of condyloma-free survival post-treatment. Anal cytology and human-papillomavirus-infection (HPV) was assessed. RESULTS:Between January 2005 and May 2009, 101 men were treated for anal condyloma acuminata: 65 (64%) with electrosurgery, 27 (27%) with infrared coagulation and 9 (9%) with imiquimod. At 1 year after treatment, the cumulative recurrence rate was 8% (4/65, 95%CI: 2-15%) with electrosurgery excision, 11% (3/27, 95%CI: 4-28%) with infrared coagulation and 11% (1/9, 95%CI: 2-44%) with imiquimod treatment. No predictive factors were associated with recurrence. Anal HPV-6 or HPV-11 was detectable in 98 (97%) patients and all had high-risk HPV genotypes, and 89 (88%) patients had abnormal anal canal cytology. Limitations: this was a retrospective descriptive analysis; limited to a single center; it cannot know if the recurrence is related to new infection. CONCLUSION:Recurrence of anal condyloma after any treatment was common. Abnormal anal cytology and high-risk HPV-infection were highly prevalent in this population, therefore at high-risk of anal cancer, and warrants careful follow-up.