Social and Emotional Learning: Research, Practice, and Policy (Dec 2024)
Towards a dynamic, idiographic approach to describing, explaining, and enhancing the development of SEL
Abstract
Human development involves intraindividual changes across the life span. Developmental changes may involve instances of change common to all individuals (nomothetic change), change common to only some groups of individuals (differential change), and change specific to an individual (idiographic change). All three types of change must be measured to obtain a holistic and integrated understanding of any facet of human development. To date, most studies of the development of social and emotional learning (SEL) skills have focused on assessing nomothetic and differential change. The analysis of data derived from this research is variable-focused, and longitudinal studies with such a focus typically do not have enough time points to model intraindividual trajectories with sufficient power. Such trajectories require analysis wherein each individual is compared to themselves across time (ipsative analyses). Change-sensitive measures used within intensive longitudinal designs and analyses are suitable for ipsative analyses of participants and enable direct comparisons of whether intraindividual trajectories are reflected in group data. We discuss research findings reflecting that meaningful idiographic changes are not reflected in group data. We also argue that future studies of SEL should integrate idiographic data with differential and nomothetic data in the service of understanding the holistic development of SEL. Impact Statement: Human development involves studying changes common to all individuals, to only some groups of individuals, and only to an individual. All three types of change must be measured to obtain a holistic understanding of all facets of human development, including social and emotional learning (SEL) skills, but most SEL research has focused on assessing only the first two of the three instances of change. We discuss SEL research demonstrating that meaningful person-specific changes are not reflected in group data. We argue that future studies of SEL should include assessing individually-specific data in order to understand the holistic development of SEL.
Keywords