Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Feb 2022)

Recommendations for analgesia and sedation in critically ill children admitted to intensive care unit

  • Angela Amigoni,
  • Giorgio Conti,
  • Alessandra Conio,
  • Manuela Corno,
  • Paola Claudia Fazio,
  • Federica Ferrero,
  • Marta Gentili,
  • Cristina Giugni,
  • Manuela L’Erario,
  • Maristella Masola,
  • Paola Moliterni,
  • Giuseppe Pagano,
  • Zaccaria Ricci,
  • Stefano Romagnoli,
  • Beatrice Vasile,
  • Francesca Vitale,
  • Geremia Zito Marinosci,
  • Maria Cristina Mondardini

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-022-00036-9
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 2, no. 1
pp. 1 – 20

Abstract

Read online

Abstract We aim to develop evidence-based recommendations for intensivists caring for children admitted to intensive care units and requiring analgesia and sedation. A panel of national paediatric intensivists expert in the field of analgesia and sedation and other specialists (a paediatrician, a neuropsychiatrist, a psychologist, a neurologist, a pharmacologist, an anaesthesiologist, two critical care nurses, a methodologist) started in 2018, a 2-year process. Three meetings and one electronic-based discussion were dedicated to the development of the recommendations (presentation of the project, selection of research questions, overview of text related to the research questions, discussion of recommendations). A telematic anonymous consultation was adopted to reach the final agreement on recommendations. A formal conflict-of-interest declaration was obtained from all the authors. Eight areas of direct interest and one additional topic were considered to identify the best available evidence and to develop the recommendations using the Evidence-to-Decision framework according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. For each recommendation, the level of evidence, the strength of the recommendation, the benefits, the harms and the risks, the benefit/harm balance, the intentional vagueness, the values judgement, the exclusions, the difference of the opinions, the knowledge gaps, and the research opportunities were reported. The panel produced 17 recommendations. Nine were evaluated as strong, 3 as moderate, and 5 as weak. Conclusion: a panel of national experts achieved consensus regarding recommendations for the best care in terms of analgesia and sedation in critically ill children.

Keywords