Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine (Apr 2023)

Sex-differences in associations of LV structure and function measured by echocardiography with long-term risk of mortality and cardiovascular morbidity

  • Lamia Al Saikhan,
  • Chloe Park,
  • Therese Tillin,
  • Siana Jones,
  • Darrel Francis,
  • Jamil Mayet,
  • Nish Chaturvedi,
  • Alun D. Hughes

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1144964
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundThree-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) measures of the left ventricle (LV) predict outcomes in high risk individuals, but their prognostic value in the general population is unknown. We aimed to establish whether 3DE was associated with mortality and morbidity in a multi-ethnic community-based sample, if associations differed by sex, and explored potential mechanisms explaining sex differences.Methods922 individuals (69.7 ± 6.2 years; 717 men) from the SABRE study underwent a health examination including echocardiography. Associations between 3DE LV measures (ejection fraction (EF), end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), LV remodeling index (LVRI) and LV sphericity index (LVSI), and all-cause mortality and a composite cardiovascular endpoint [comprising new onset (non)fatal coronary heart disease, heart failure hospitalization, new-onset arrhythmias and cardiovascular mortality] were determined using multivariable Cox regression over a median follow-up of 8 years (all-cause mortality) and 7 years (composite cardiovascular endpoint).ResultsThere were 123 deaths and 151 composite cardiovascular endpoints. Lower EF, higher LV volumes and LVSI were associated with increased all-cause mortality, and higher LV volumes were associated with the composite cardiovascular endpoint independent of potential confounders. Associations between LV volumes, LVRI, LVSI, and mortality differed by sex (p interaction <0.1). In men increased LV volumes and LVSI and decreased LVRI and EF were associated with higher mortality, but associations were null or reversed in women (hazard ratios (95% CI) men vs. women: EDV 1.25 (1.05, 1.48) vs. 0.54 (0.26, 1.10); ESV, 1.36 (1.12, 1.63) vs. 0.59 (0.33, 1.04); LVRI, 0.79 (0.64, 0.96) vs. 1.70 (1.03, 2.80); LVSI, 1.27 (1.05, 1.54) vs. 0.61 (0.32, 1.15); and EF, 0.78 (0.66, 0.93) vs. 1.27 (0.69, 2.33). Similar sex differences were observed for associations with the composite cardiovascular outcome. Adjustment for LV diastolic stiffness and arterial stiffness marginally attenuated these differences.Conclusions3DE measures of LV volume and remodeling are associated with all-cause mortality and cardiovascular morbidity; however, some associations differ by sex. Sex-differences in LV remodeling patterns may influence mortality and morbidity risk in the general population.

Keywords