Factors associated with spinal fixation mechanical failure after tumor resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Abstract Background No available meta-analysis has been published that systematically assessed spinal fixation mechanical failure after tumor resection based on largely pooled data. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the spinal fixation failure rate and potential risk factors for hardware failure. Methods Electronic articles published between January 1, 1979, and January 30, 2021, were searched and critically evaluated. The authors independently reviewed the abstracts and extracted data on the spinal fixation failure rate and potential risk factors. Results Thirty-eight studies were finally included in the meta-analysis. The pooled spinal fixation mechanical failure rate was 10%. The significant risk factors for hardware failure included tumor level and cage subsidence. Radiotherapy was a potential risk factor. Conclusion The spinal fixation mechanical failure rate was 10%. Spinal fixation failure is mainly associated with tumor level, cage subsidence and radiotherapy. Durable reconstruction is needed for patients with these risk factors.

Keywords

• Spinal tumor resection
• Spinal fixation mechanical failure
• Risk factors
• Tumor level
• Cage subsidence
• Radiotherapy