Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology (Jul 2023)

Deep learning system assisted detection and localization of lumbar spondylolisthesis

  • Jiayao Zhang,
  • Jiayao Zhang,
  • Heng Lin,
  • Honglin Wang,
  • Honglin Wang,
  • Mingdi Xue,
  • Mingdi Xue,
  • Ying Fang,
  • Ying Fang,
  • Songxiang Liu,
  • Songxiang Liu,
  • Tongtong Huo,
  • Hong Zhou,
  • Hong Zhou,
  • Jiaming Yang,
  • Jiaming Yang,
  • Yi Xie,
  • Yi Xie,
  • Mao Xie,
  • Mao Xie,
  • Liangli Cheng,
  • Lin Lu,
  • Pengran Liu,
  • Pengran Liu,
  • Zhewei Ye,
  • Zhewei Ye

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1194009
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11

Abstract

Read online

Objective: Explore a new deep learning (DL) object detection algorithm for clinical auxiliary diagnosis of lumbar spondylolisthesis and compare it with doctors’ evaluation to verify the effectiveness and feasibility of the DL algorithm in the diagnosis of lumbar spondylolisthesis.Methods: Lumbar lateral radiographs of 1,596 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis from three medical institutions were collected, and senior orthopedic surgeons and radiologists jointly diagnosed and marked them to establish a database. These radiographs were randomly divided into a training set (n = 1,117), a validation set (n = 240), and a test set (n = 239) in a ratio of 0.7 : 0.15: 0.15. We trained two DL models for automatic detection of spondylolisthesis and evaluated their diagnostic performance by PR curves, areas under the curve, precision, recall, F1-score. Then we chose the model with better performance and compared its results with professionals’ evaluation.Results: A total of 1,780 annotations were marked for training (1,242), validation (263), and test (275). The Faster Region-based Convolutional Neural Network (R-CNN) showed better precision (0.935), recall (0.935), and F1-score (0.935) in the detection of spondylolisthesis, which outperformed the doctor group with precision (0.927), recall (0.892), f1-score (0.910). In addition, with the assistance of the DL model, the precision of the doctor group increased by 4.8%, the recall by 8.2%, the F1-score by 6.4%, and the average diagnosis time per plain X-ray was shortened by 7.139 s.Conclusion: The DL detection algorithm is an effective method for clinical diagnosis of lumbar spondylolisthesis. It can be used as an assistant expert to improve the accuracy of lumbar spondylolisthesis diagnosis and reduce the clinical workloads.

Keywords