PLoS ONE (Jan 2024)

National outcomes of expedited discharge following esophagectomy for malignancy.

  • Shayan Ebrahimian,
  • Nikhil Chervu,
  • Joseph Hadaya,
  • Nam Yong Cho,
  • Elsa Kronen,
  • Sara Sakowitz,
  • Arjun Verma,
  • Syed Shahyan Bakhtiyar,
  • Yas Sanaiha,
  • Peyman Benharash

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297470
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 19, no. 2
p. e0297470

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundExpedited discharge following esophagectomy is controversial due to concerns for higher readmissions and financial burden. The present study aimed to evaluate the association of expedited discharge with hospitalization costs and unplanned readmissions following esophagectomy for malignant lesions.MethodsAdults undergoing elective esophagectomy for cancer were identified in the 2014-2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Patients discharged by postoperative day 7 were considered Expedited and others as Routine. Patients who did not survive to discharge or had major perioperative complications were excluded. Multivariable regression models were constructed to assess association of expedited discharge with index hospitalization costs as well as 30- and 90-day non-elective readmissions.ResultsOf 9,886 patients who met study criteria, 34.6% comprised the Expedited cohort. After adjustment, female sex (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.71, p = 0.001) and increasing Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (AOR 0.88/point, pConclusionExpedited discharge after esophagectomy was associated with decreased costs and unaltered readmissions. Prospective studies are necessary to robustly evaluate whether expedited discharge is appropriate for select patients undergoing esophagectomy.