The Importance of Livestock Demography and Infrastructure in Driving Foot and Mouth Disease Dynamics
Kendra Gilbertson,
Peter Brommesson,
Amanda Minter,
Clayton Hallman,
Ryan S. Miller,
Katie Portacci,
Stefan Sellman,
Michael J. Tildesley,
Colleen T. Webb,
Tom Lindström,
Lindsay M. Beck-Johnson
Affiliations
Kendra Gilbertson
Department of Biology, Colorado State University, 1878 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
Peter Brommesson
Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Division of Theoretical Biology, Linköping University, 581 83 Linköping, Sweden
Amanda Minter
Zeeman Institute for Systems Biology and Infectious Disease Epidemiology Research (SBIDER), School of Life Sciences and Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
Clayton Hallman
USDA APHIS Veterinary Services, Center for Epidemiology and Animal Health, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA
Ryan S. Miller
USDA APHIS Veterinary Services, Center for Epidemiology and Animal Health, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA
Katie Portacci
USDA APHIS Veterinary Services, Center for Epidemiology and Animal Health, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA
Stefan Sellman
Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Division of Theoretical Biology, Linköping University, 581 83 Linköping, Sweden
Michael J. Tildesley
Zeeman Institute for Systems Biology and Infectious Disease Epidemiology Research (SBIDER), School of Life Sciences and Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
Colleen T. Webb
Department of Biology, Colorado State University, 1878 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
Tom Lindström
Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Division of Theoretical Biology, Linköping University, 581 83 Linköping, Sweden
Lindsay M. Beck-Johnson
Department of Biology, Colorado State University, 1878 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
Transboundary animal diseases, such as foot and mouth disease (FMD) pose a significant and ongoing threat to global food security. Such diseases can produce large, spatially complex outbreaks. Mathematical models are often used to understand the spatio-temporal dynamics and create response plans for possible disease introductions. Model assumptions regarding transmission behavior of premises and movement patterns of livestock directly impact our understanding of the ecological drivers of outbreaks and how to best control them. Here, we investigate the impact that these assumptions have on model predictions of FMD outbreaks in the U.S. using models of livestock shipment networks and disease spread. We explore the impact of changing assumptions about premises transmission behavior, both by including within-herd dynamics, and by accounting for premises type and increasing the accuracy of shipment predictions. We find that the impact these assumptions have on outbreak predictions is less than the impact of the underlying livestock demography, but that they are important for investigating some response objectives, such as the impact on trade. These results suggest that demography is a key ecological driver of outbreaks and is critical for making robust predictions but that understanding management objectives is also important when making choices about model assumptions.