Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences (Nov 2015)

Fracture strength of ceramic brackets submitted to archwire torsional strain

  • Fernando Rayes Manhães,
  • Rosilene Divino,
  • Adriana Simone Lucato,
  • Sílvia Amélia Scudeler Vedovello,
  • Cristian Correa,
  • Heloísa Cristina Valdrigh

DOI
https://doi.org/10.20396/bjos.v10i3.8641626
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 3

Abstract

Read online

Aim: To evaluate the fracture strength of ceramic brackets submitted to archwire torsional strain. Methods: Different types of maxillary central incisor ceramic brackets from four different commercial brands, Roth prescription (0.022" x 0.028"), were evaluated, namely: Mystique (GAC), InVu (TP Orthodontics), Clarity (3M Unitek) and Luxi II (RMO Ortohodontics). To evaluate the fracture strength, 0.019"x 0.025" stainless steel orthodontic wires were inserted into the bracket channels and submitted to torsion until they fractured. Results: The InVu brackets showed a significantly higher fracture strength than the other brackets (p0.05). Conclusions: Among the brackets tested, the traditional ceramic bracket InVu showed the highest fracture strength, while the Luxi II bracket, obtained the lowest value.

Keywords