Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (Jul 2022)
Metric Learning in Freewill EEG Pre-Movement and Movement Intention Classification for Brain Machine Interfaces
Abstract
Decoding movement related intentions is a key step to implement BMIs. Decoding EEG has been challenging due to its low spatial resolution and signal to noise ratio. Metric learning allows finding a representation of data in a way that captures a desired notion of similarity between data points. In this study, we investigate how metric learning can help finding a representation of the data to efficiently classify EEG movement and pre-movement intentions. We evaluate the effectiveness of the obtained representation by comparing classification the performance of a Support Vector Machine (SVM) as a classifier when trained on the original representation, called Euclidean, and representations obtained with three different metric learning algorithms, including Conditional Entropy Metric Learning (CEML), Neighborhood Component Analysis (NCA), and the Entropy Gap Metric Learning (EGML) algorithms. We examine different types of features, such as time and frequency components, which input to the metric learning algorithm, and both linear and non-linear SVM are applied to compare the classification accuracies on a publicly available EEG data set for two subjects (Subject B and C). Although metric learning algorithms do not increase the classification accuracies, their interpretability using an importance measure we define here, helps understanding data organization and how much each EEG channel contributes to the classification. In addition, among the metric learning algorithms we investigated, EGML shows the most robust performance due to its ability to compensate for differences in scale and correlations among variables. Furthermore, from the observed variations of the importance maps on the scalp and the classification accuracy, selecting an appropriate feature such as clipping the frequency range has a significant effect on the outcome of metric learning and subsequent classification. In our case, reducing the range of the frequency components to 0–5 Hz shows the best interpretability in both Subject B and C and classification accuracy for Subject C. Our experiments support potential benefits of using metric learning algorithms by providing visual explanation of the data projections that explain the inter class separations, using importance. This visualizes the contribution of features that can be related to brain function.
Keywords
