Foods (Jun 2024)

Kinetic Evaluation of the Production of Mead from a Non-<i>Saccharomyces</i> Strain

  • Jorge Alberto Jose-Salazar,
  • Christian Bryan Ballinas-Cesatti,
  • Diana Maylet Hernández-Martínez,
  • Eliseo Cristiani-Urbina,
  • Guiomar Melgar-Lalanne,
  • Liliana Morales-Barrera

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13121948
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 12
p. 1948

Abstract

Read online

There is a growing market for craft beverages with unique flavors. This study aimed to obtain a palate-pleasing mead derived from Pichia kudriavzevii 4A as a monoculture. Different culture media were evaluated to compare the fermentation kinetics and final products. The crucial factors in the medium were ~200 mg L−1 of yeast assimilable nitrogen and a pH of 3.5–5.0. A panel of judges favored the mead derived from Pichia kudriavzevii 4A (fermented in a medium with honey initially at 23 °Bx) over a commercial sample produced from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, considering its appearance, fruity and floral flavors (provided by esters, aldehydes, and higher alcohols), and balance between sweetness (given by the 82.91 g L−1 of residual sugars) and alcohol. The present mead had an 8.57% v/v ethanol concentration, was elaborated in 28 days, and reached a maximum biomass growth (2.40 g L−1) on the same fermentation day (6) that the minimum level of pH was reached. The biomass growth yield peaked at 24 and 48 h (~0.049 g g−1), while the ethanol yield peaked at 24 h (1.525 ± 0.332 g g−1), in both cases declining thereafter. The Gompertz model adequately describes the kinetics of sugar consumption and the generation of yeast biomass and ethanol. Pathogenic microorganisms, methanol, lead, and arsenic were absent in the mead. Thus, Pichia kudriavzevii 4A produced a safe and quality mead with probable consumer acceptance.

Keywords