Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (Feb 2024)

Development and Validation of a Prognostic Nomogram for Patients with AFP and DCP Double-Negative Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Local Ablation

  • Qiao W,
  • Li J,
  • Wang Q,
  • Jin R,
  • Zhang H

Journal volume & issue
Vol. Volume 11
pp. 271 – 284

Abstract

Read online

Wenying Qiao,1– 3,* Jiashuo Li,2,* Qi Wang,2,* Ronghua Jin,2,3 Honghai Zhang1 1Interventional Therapy Center for Oncology, Beijing You’an Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; 2Beijing Di’tan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; 3Changping Laboratory, Beijing, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Ronghua Jin, Beijing Di’tan Hospital, Capital Medical University, 8 Jingshun East Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, People’s Republic of China, Tel/Fax +86-13811611118, Email [email protected] Honghai Zhang, Interventional therapy center for oncology, Beijing You’an Hospital, Capital Medical University, 8 Xitoutiao, Youanmenwai Street, Fengtai District, Beijing, People’s Republic of China, Tel/Fax +86-13260398697, Email [email protected]: Although alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and des-gamma-carboxyprothrombin (DCP) have a certain predictive ability for the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), there are still some cases of aggressive recurrence among patients with AFP and DCP double-negative HCC (DNHC) after local ablation. However, prediction models to forecast the prognosis of DNHC patients are still lacking. Thus, this retrospective study aims to explore the prognostic factors in DNHC patients and develop a nomogram to predict recurrence.Patients and methods: 493 DNHC patients who underwent the local ablation at Beijing You’an Hospital between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2022, were enrolled. A part that was admitted from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2018, was designated to the training cohort (n = 307); others from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2022, were allocated to the validation cohort (n = 186). Lasso regression and Cox regression were employed with the aim of screening risk factors and developing the nomogram. The nomogram outcome was assessed by discrimination, calibration, and decision curve analysis (DCA).Results: Independent prognostic factors selected by Lasso-Cox analysis included age, tumor size, tumor number, and gamma-glutamyl transferase. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUCs) of the training and validation groups (0.738, 0.742, 0.836, and 0.758, 0.821) exhibited the excellent predicted outcome of the nomogram. Calibration plots and DCA plots suggest desirable calibration performance and clinical utility. Patients were stratified into three risk groups by means of the nomogram: low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk, respectively. There exists an obvious distinction in recurrence-free survival (RFS) among three groups (p< 0.0001).Conclusion: In conclusion, we established and validated a nomogram for DNHC patients who received local ablation. The nomogram showed excellent predictive power for the recurrence of HCC and could contribute to guiding clinical decisions.Keywords: hepatocellular carcinoma, nomogram, prognosis, local ablation, alpha-fetoprotein, des-gamma-carboxyprothrombin

Keywords