Scientific Reports (Feb 2024)

A hybridized red deer and rough set clinical information retrieval system for hepatitis B diagnosis

  • Madhusmita Mishra,
  • D. P. Acharjya

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-53170-5
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 1
pp. 1 – 19

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Healthcare is a big concern in the current booming population. Many approaches for improving health are imposed, such as early disease identification, treatment, and prevention. Therefore, knowledge acquisition is highly essential at different stages of decision-making. Inferring knowledge from the information system, which necessitates multiple steps for extracting useful information, is one technique to address this problem. Handling uncertainty throughout data analysis is also another challenging task. Computer intelligence is a step forward to this end while selecting characteristics, classification, clustering, and developing clinical information retrieval systems. According to recent studies, swarm optimization is a useful technique for discovering key features while resolving real-world issues. However, it is ineffective in managing uncertainty. Conversely, a rough set helps a decision system generate decision rules. This produces decision rules without any additional information. In order to assess real-world information systems while managing uncertainties, a hybrid strategy that combines a rough set and red deer algorithm is presented in this research. In the red deer optimization algorithm, the suggested method selects the optimal characteristics in terms of the degree of dependence on the rough set. In order to determine the decision rules, further a rough set is used. The efficiency of the suggested model is also contrasted with that of the decision tree algorithm and the conventional rough set. An empirical study on hepatitis disease illustrates the viability of the proposed research as compared to the decision tree and crisp rough set. The proposed hybridization of rough set and red deer algorithm achieves an accuracy of 91.7% accuracy. The acquired accuracy for the decision tree, and rough set methods is 82.9%, and 88.9%, respectively. It suggests that the proposed research is viable.