PLoS ONE (Jan 2013)

Limitations of augmentation index in the assessment of wave reflection in normotensive healthy individuals.

  • Alun D Hughes,
  • Chloe Park,
  • Justin Davies,
  • Darrel Francis,
  • Simon A McG Thom,
  • Jamil Mayet,
  • Kim H Parker

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059371
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 3
p. e59371

Abstract

Read online

ObjectivesAugmentation index (AIx) is widely used as a measure of wave reflection. We compared the relationship between AIx and age, height and sex with 'gold standard' measures of wave reflection derived from measurements of pressure and flow to establish how well AIx measures wave reflection.Materials and methodsMeasurements of carotid pressure and flow velocity were made in the carotid artery of 65 healthy normotensive individuals (age 21-78 yr; 43 male) and pulse wave analysis, wave intensity analysis and wave separation was performed; waveforms were classified into type A, B or C. AIx, the time of the first shoulder (T(s)), wave reflection index (WRI) and the ratio of backward to forward pressure (P(b)/P(f)) were calculated.ResultsAIx did not correlate with log WRI or P(b)/P(f). When AIx was restricted to positive values AIx and log WRI were positively correlated (r = 0.33; p = 0.04). In contrast log WRI and P(b)/P(f) were closely correlated (r = 0.66; pConclusionsAIx has serious limitations as a measure of wave reflection. Negative AIx values derived from Type C waves should not be used as estimates of wave reflection magnitude.