Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) on surgical site infection and postoperative recovery outcomes: a retrospective study of 1276 cases

Abstract

Abstract This retrospective observational study aimed to evaluate the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) in the era of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) and the effect of ERAS on postoperative outcomes. Totally 1,276 patients (565 in ERAS group and 711 in non-ERAS group) who underwent operations at the department of general surgery during 2017–2021 were included. Risk factors were identified via logistic regression analysis and meta-analysis of all relevant published studies was performed. Subsequently, propensity score matching was used to match different risk factors. Overall, 40 patients were diagnosed with SSI, and the pooled incidence of SSI was 3.13%. In total, 14 (2.48%) and 26 (3.66%) patients in the ERAS and non-ERAS groups, respectively, were diagnosed with SSI (P = 0.230). Among patients for whom the ERAS protocol was adopted, 7 independent risk factors of SSI were identified. After propensity score matching, in patients without SSI, the number of hospital days was significantly lower in the ERAS group than in the non-ERAS group (2 [2, 5] vs. 3 [2, 7], P = 0.005), whereas in patients with SSI, the number of hospital days was similar between the ERAS and non-ERAS groups. ERAS had no effect on the incidence of SSI but could significantly accelerate the discharge of uninfected patients. In the era of ERAS, SSI incidence was affected by the type of surgery; number of postoperative hospital days; type of incision; serum hemoglobin, total protein, and albumin levels; and antibiotic prophylaxis. Furthermore, these results will significantly affect the implementation of the ERAS protocol and optimal preoperative management.

Keywords

• Enhanced recovery after surgery
• Surgical site infection
• Risk factor
• Meta-analysis
• Propensity score matching