PLoS ONE (Jan 2023)

Bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy and reconstruction-A 12-year review of methodological trends and outcomes at a tertiary referral centre.

  • Aiman Aslam,
  • Zaki Arshad,
  • Amir Ahmed,
  • Chien Lin Soh,
  • Fawz Kazzazi,
  • John R Benson,
  • Parto Forouhi,
  • Amit Agrawal,
  • Sarah L Benyon,
  • Michael Irwin,
  • Charles M Malata

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281601
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 18, no. 4
p. e0281601

Abstract

Read online

IntroductionBilateral risk-reducing mastectomy (BRRM) involves removal of healthy breast tissue to substantially decrease the risk of developing breast cancer in individuals with greater susceptibility due to a strong family history or genetic mutation. This retrospective study evaluates cases of BRRM and associated reconstruction performed at a tertiary centre, with emphasis on mastectomy and reconstructive trends.MethodsA retrospective review of all BRRM cases performed between January 2010 and May 2022 was conducted, with two separate cohorts corresponding to the earlier (group 1) and later (group 2) portion of the time-period. Data collected included demographics, genetic test results, family history of breast/ovarian cancer, co-morbidities, mastectomy type, reconstruction type, surgical histopathology findings and post-operative complications.ResultsA total of 82 patients (group 1 = 41, group 2 = 41) underwent BRRM. The proportion of nipple-sparing mastectomy increased from 14.6% to 56.1% between the two time periods with a reduction in skin-sparing mastectomies from 75.6% to 20.3% (pConclusionThis study documents recent increases in nipple-sparing techniques for BRRM compared to more traditional skin-sparing methods. Concurrently, reconstruction following RRM has become predominantly implant-based without a flap, coinciding with more widespread usage of ADM. This is consistent with national trends towards fewer complex autologous procedures.