Co‐trimoxazole prophylaxis for children who are HIV‐exposed and uninfected: a systematic review

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Co‐trimoxazole prophylaxis is recommended for children born to women with HIV to protect those who acquire HIV from opportunistic infections, severe bacterial infections and malaria. With scale‐up of maternal antiretroviral therapy, most children remain HIV‐exposed uninfected (HEU) and the benefits of universal co‐trimoxazole are uncertain. We assessed the effect of co‐trimoxazole on mortality and morbidity of children who are HEU. Methods We performed a systematic review (PROSPERO number: CRD42021215059). We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Global Health, CINAHL Plus, Africa‐Wide Information, SciELO and WHO Global Index Medicus for peer‐reviewed articles from inception to 4th January 2022 without limits. Ongoing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified through registries. We included RCTs reporting mortality or morbidity in children who are HEU receiving co‐trimoxazole versus no prophylaxis/placebo. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane 2.0 tool. Data were summarized using narrative synthesis and findings were stratified by malaria endemicity. Results We screened 1257 records and included seven reports from four RCTs. Two trials from Botswana and South Africa of 4067 children who are HEU found no difference in mortality or infectious morbidity in children randomized to co‐trimoxazole prophylaxis started at 2–6 weeks of age compared to those randomized to placebo or no treatment, although event rates were low. Sub‐studies found that antimicrobial resistance was higher in infants receiving co‐trimoxazole. Two trials in Uganda investigating prolonged co‐trimoxazole after breastfeeding cessation showed protection against malaria but no other morbidity or mortality differences. All trials had some concerns or a high risk of bias, which limited the certainty of evidence. Discussion Studies show no clinical benefit of co‐trimoxazole prophylaxis in children who are HEU, except to prevent malaria. Potential harms were identified for co‐trimoxazole prophylaxis leading to antimicrobial resistance. The trials in non‐malarial regions were conducted in populations with low mortality potentially reducing generalizability to other settings. Conclusions In low‐mortality settings with few HIV transmissions and well‐performing early infant diagnosis and treatment programmes, universal co‐trimoxazole may not be required.

Keywords

• co‐trimoxazole
• mortality
• morbidity
• HIV exposure
• infants
• public health