Preventive Medicine Reports (Dec 2023)

Effectiveness of a media campaign promoting health care provider tobacco dependence treatment

  • Kim A. Hayes,
  • Elizabeth M. Brown,
  • James Nonnemaker,
  • Harlan Juster,
  • Christina Ortega-Peluso,
  • Matthew C. Farrelly,
  • Kevin Davis

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 36
p. 102403

Abstract

Read online

The New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) developed a provider-focused media campaign to encourage provision of evidence-based, clinical tobacco dependence treatment (TDT). The purpose of this study was to assess providers’ awareness of the campaign and the relationship between campaign awareness and changes in campaign-related beliefs and clinical TDT intervention. We conducted a longitudinal, mailed survey of health care providers in New York State (n = 851; AAPOR3 RR: 24.6%). We estimated descriptive statistics and used multivariable regression analyses to assess whether changes in key outcomes (campaign-related beliefs and clinical TDT) from pre- to post-campaign vary by self-reported campaign awareness. Approximately 12% of providers were aware of the campaign. In multivariable analyses, changes from pre- to post-campaign in provider beliefs that the nicotine patch and gum are very effective at helping patients quit were greater for providers aware of the campaign compared with those not aware of the campaign (For patch: OR 2.17, CI 1.06–4.45, p = 0.03; for gum: OR 2.78, CI: 1.24–6.27, p = 0.01), but not for provider behavior. After seeing the NYSDOH campaign, providers’ beliefs about the effectiveness of the patch and gum increased. Many state tobacco control programs and health care organizations are implementing tobacco-related policies and systems to facilitate the provision of clinical TDT; this study suggests that a digital and print provider-focused media campaign has the potential to complement health systems change interventions. Future studies should seek to identify ways to modify ad delivery to increase campaign awareness to maximize potential campaign impact.

Keywords