JCO Global Oncology (Jan 2025)

Multicentric Cross-Sectional Survey to Assess the Variation of Fractionation Strategies Used in the Management of Head and Neck Cancers in the Asian Region (INNOCENCE-ASIA)

  • Ajeet Kumar Gandhi,
  • Supriya Chopra,
  • Madhup Rastogi,
  • Indranil Mallick,
  • Misael C. Cruz,
  • Koichi Yasuda,
  • Ying Ying Sum,
  • Yasushi Nagata,
  • Hong-Gyun Wu,
  • Gregorius B. Prajogi,
  • Henry Kodrat,
  • Mingwei Ma,
  • Asif Nisar,
  • Imjai Chitapanarux

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/GO-24-00349
Journal volume & issue
no. 11

Abstract

Read online

PURPOSEHead and neck cancers (HNCs) are in general treated with conventional fractionation regimen of 1.8-2 Gy per fraction. Altered fractionation (ALFT) strategies such as hypofractionation radiotherapy (HYPO-RT), accelerated fractionation radiotherapy (AFRT), and hyperfractionation radiotherapy (HFRT) have not been practiced uniformly across centers in different parts of the world. Countries in Asia share common cancer demographics, and we designed this survey for Federation of Asian Radiation Oncology (FARO) member countries to understand the usage and challenges in the delivery of ALFT in HNCs.MATERIALS AND METHODSA 21-point electronic survey (Federation of Asian Radiation Oncology Research Network [FERN]-S-005) was designed by the FERN and was circulated through the FARO research secretariat to the FARO council member countries and the responses were collected between August and November 2023.RESULTSTwelve of 14 member countries (85.7%) responded to the survey. Twenty-seven responses were received and 78% of the respondents belonged to government/teaching academic institute. 4/27 (14.8%) reported never using HYPO-RT for any of the clinical subsite of HNCs, while the majority (85.2%) used it for glottic cancers and 22% also used it for postoperative setting. Majority (77.7%) used a fractionation schedule with dose per fraction ranging between 2.2 and 2.5 Gy. 6/27 (22.2%) used AFRT for definitive setting and five of these also used concurrent chemoradiotherapy. 4/27 (14.8%) centers reported using HFRT. The most common reason (62.9%) for the limited usage of AFRT/HFRT was reported to be logistical, such as unavailability of machine slots, patient load, and so on.CONCLUSIONThe result of the survey suggests that among the ALFT strategies for HNCs, HYPO-RT schedules have common interest and feasibility among the FARO member countries and also highlights the challenges in the delivery of AFRT/HFRT in the Asian region.