Middle East Fertility Society Journal (Dec 2014)

Evaluation of ultrasonographic and Anti-Müllerian Hormone (AMH) changes as predictors for ovarian reserve after laparoscopic ovarian drilling for women with polycystic ovarian syndrome

  • Emad M. Seyam,
  • T.G. Mohamed,
  • Momen M. Hasan,
  • Marwa H. Abd Al Mawgood

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mefs.2014.02.004
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 19, no. 4
pp. 314 – 323

Abstract

Read online

Background and aim of the study: Laparoscopic ovarian drilling (LOD) is considered one of the effective tools for treatment of women with polycystic ovarian syndrome. The aim of this work was to evaluate the effects of laparoscopic ovarian drilling on ovarian reserve assessed by Anti-Müllerian hormone assay and ultrasonography. Study design: The current prospective controlled study included 70 (n = 70) primary anovulatory women with PCOS who are allocated to undergo LOD (n = 40), who are clomiphene citrate (CC) resistant, and another group receiving incremental doses (50–150 mg) of CC (n = 30) and 20 healthy age-matched women with a regular menstrual cycle and normal ovaries (confirmed with ultrasound examination) as the control group. Materials and methods: For the LOD group, standard laparoscopy ovarian drilling was done just after the end of the menstruation using a monopolar electrocautery needle. For the CC group, clomiphene citrate was given in incremental doses (50–150 mg) for up to six cycles from days 2–6 of a menstrual cycle or after a progestin withdrawal bleeding. Evaluation for the ovarian reserve was done using the following tests: (1) AMH level in the third cycle day, (2) antral follicle count (AFC) by TVS, and (3) summed ovarian volume (SOV) by transvaginal ultrasound examination (TVS). Results: In the current study, among the (40) PCOS women having LOD, 30/40 (75%) had regular cycles in the 6-month period after LOD, while the ovulation rate was 24/40 (60%) and the pregnancy rate was 11/40 (27.5%) in the 6-month period after LOD. Those rates were not statistically different in the PCO women group treated with CC. There were statistically significant differences between AMH levels and antral follicle count before and after LOD (p = 0.001 and 0.009 respectively) and this might indicate a possible diminished ovarian reserve. Conclusion: AMH and AFC are reliable markers for assessment of the ovarian reserve and measuring them for women with anovulatory PCOS undergoing LOD may provide a useful tool in evaluating the outcome of LOD.

Keywords