IEEE Access (Jan 2022)
Sequential Fusion Based Approach for Estimating Range Gate Pull-Off Parameter in a Networked Radar System: An ECCM Algorithm
Abstract
Networked radar is an emerging and effective alternative to traditional radar systems to provide improved performance by fusing information from multiple radars. Further, networked radar systems (NRS) have found numerous deployments in military and civilian infrastructures in recent years. Electronic countermeasures (ECM) like jamming, Range Gate Pull-Off (RGPO), and Velocity Gate Pull-Off (VGPO) generally pose a high risk to the radar systems by injecting intentional interference. This paper proposes networked radar to detect the RGPO ECM attack and estimate the range gate deception parameter of the deceived local track in an NRS. Each radar comprises a local tracker to provide the local estimates (updated state and updated covariance), and these estimates are then sent to the fusion node. Thereafter, a track-to-track association (T2TA) is formulated at the fusion node to detect the deceived tracks using all the available local tracks. For the deceived track, the pseudo-measurements are created using the inverse Kalman filter-based tracklets. All the local tracks except deceived track are compensated and sequentially fused to create a reference measurement. After that, the deception parameter of the deceived track is estimated by using pseudo-measurement and the reference measurement by employing the recursive least square estimator (RLSE). In addition, the proposed algorithm is analyzed for single and multiple RGPO based ECM scenarios. Further, the Cramer Rao Lower Bound (CRLB) for the proposed methodology is derived. The results are quantified with a Position Root Mean Square Error (PRMSE), CRLB, innovation test, normalized estimation error squared (NEES) test, and confidence interval. The simulation results demonstrate that the proposed estimation technique provides good performance in the presence of all the local tracks are being attacked by RGPO ECM. Besides, it is evident from the results that estimator efficiency is falling below the 5% tail probability of the chi-square distribution.
Keywords