Nutrition & Metabolism (Feb 2008)

Physiogenomic comparison of human fat loss in response to diets restrictive of carbohydrate or fat

  • Seip Richard L,
  • Volek Jeff S,
  • Windemuth Andreas,
  • Kocherla Mohan,
  • Fernandez Maria Luz,
  • Kraemer William J,
  • Ruaño Gualberto

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-7075-5-4
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 5, no. 1
p. 4

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Genetic factors that predict responses to diet may ultimately be used to individualize dietary recommendations. We used physiogenomics to explore associations among polymorphisms in candidate genes and changes in relative body fat (Δ%BF) to low fat and low carbohydrate diets. Methods We assessed Δ%BF using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in 93 healthy adults who consumed a low carbohydrate diet (carbohydrate ~12% total energy) (LC diet) and in 70, a low fat diet (fat ~25% total energy) (LF diet). Fifty-three single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) selected from 28 candidate genes involved in food intake, energy homeostasis, and adipocyte regulation were ranked according to probability of association with the change in %BF using multiple linear regression. Results Dieting reduced %BF by 3.0 ± 2.6% (absolute units) for LC and 1.9 ± 1.6% for LF (p RARB) (p PFKL), and rs3100722 in the histamine N-methyl transferase (HNMT) genes (both p AGTR2) gene due to LC (p Conclusion Fat loss under LC and LF diet regimes appears to have distinct mechanisms, with PFKL and HNMT and RARB involved in fat restriction; and AGTR2 involved in carbohydrate restriction. These discoveries could provide clues to important physiologic mechanisms underlying the Δ%BF to low carbohydrate and low fat diets.