Does clinical score accurately support fecoflowmetry as a means to assess anorectal motor activity in pediatric patients after anorectal surgery?

Abstract

Purpose: We investigated the relationship between Krickenbeck score (KS) and fecoflowmetry (FFM) parameters and assessed the characteristics of this new questionnaire test by comparing Kelly's clinical score (KCS) in pediatric patients with anorectal surgery for anorectal malformation (ARM) and Hirschsprung's disease (HD). Methods: We enrolled pediatric patients who underwent anorectal surgery for ARM or HD. Bowel function was assessed with KS and KCS thereafter, FFM and anorectal manometry (AM) were conducted. Patients were divided into subgroups according to each parameter of the scoring system and each FFM parameter was compared among the KCS or KS subgroups, respectively. Moreover, correlation analyses were conducted between FFM and AM parameters. Results: The comparison of FFM parameters among the subgroups of KCS showed that Fmax in the KCS staining 2 group was significantly higher than that in KCS staining 1 group and the Fmax in KCS sphincter squeeze 1 group was significantly higher than that in KCS sphincter squeeze 0 group. Moreover, Fmax in the KCS “good” group was significantly higher than that in the KCS “fair” group. The comparison of FFM parameters among the subgroups of KS parameters showed that TR in the no soiling group was significantly higher than that in the KS grade 2 soiling group. FFM and AM parameters showed a significant positive correlation between Fmax and voluntary squeezing anal pressure. Conclusion: FFM clarified the different characteristics of two scoring systems, namely, KCS reflects the anal sphincter performance, whereas the KS soiling score might reflect the tolerance and evacuation ability.

Keywords

• Fecoflowmetry
• Krickenbeck scoring system
• Kelly's clinical score
• Anorectal malformation
• Hirschsprung's disease
• Bowel function