EClinicalMedicine (Oct 2021)

Diagnostic performance of a colorimetric RT -LAMP for the identification of SARS-CoV-2: A multicenter prospective clinical evaluation in sub-Saharan Africa

  • Marycelin Mandu Baba,
  • Molalegne Bitew,
  • Joseph Fokam,
  • Eric Agola Lelo,
  • Ahmed Ahidjo,
  • Kominist Asmamaw,
  • Grace Angong Beloumou,
  • Wallace Dimbuson Bulimo,
  • Emanuele Buratti,
  • Collins Chenwi,
  • Hailu Dadi,
  • Pierlanfranco D'Agaro,
  • Laura De Conti,
  • Nadine Fainguem,
  • Galadima Gadzama,
  • Paolo Maiuri,
  • Janet Majanja,
  • Wadegu Meshack,
  • Alexis Ndjolo,
  • Celine Nkenfou,
  • Bamidele Soji Oderinde,
  • Silvanos Mukunzi Opanda,
  • Ludovica Segat,
  • Cristiana Stuani,
  • Samwel L. Symekher,
  • Desire Takou,
  • Kassahun Tesfaye,
  • Gianluca Triolo,
  • Keyru Tuki,
  • Serena Zacchigna,
  • Alessandro Marcello

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 40
p. 101101

Abstract

Read online

Background: Management and control of the COVID-19 pandemic caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 is critically dependent on quick and reliable identification of the virus in clinical specimens. Detection of viral RNA by a colorimetric reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) is a simple, reliable and cost-effective assay, deployable in resource-limited settings (RLS). Our objective was to evaluate the intrinsic and extrinsic performances of RT-LAMP in RLS. Methods: This is a multicenter prospective observational study of diagnostic accuracy, conducted from October 2020 to February 2021 in four African Countries: Cameroon, Ethiopia, Kenya and Nigeria; and in Italy. We enroled 1657 individuals who were either COVID-19 suspect cases, or asymptomatic and presented for screening. RNA extracted from pharyngeal swabs was tested in parallel by a colorimetric RT-LAMP and by a standard real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Findings: The sensitivity and specificity of index RT LAMP compared to standard RT-PCR on 1657 prospective specimens from infected individuals was determined. For a subset of 1292 specimens, which underwent exactly the same procedures in different countries, we obtained very high specificity (98%) and positive predictive value (PPV = 99%), while the sensitivity was 87%, with a negative predictive value NPV = 70%, Stratification of RT-PCR data showed superior sensitivity achieved with an RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) below 35 (97%), which decreased to 60% above 35. Interpretation: In this field trial, RT-LAMP appears to be a reliable assay, comparable to RT-PCR, particularly with medium-high viral loads (Ct < 35). Hence, RT-LAMP can be deployed in RLS for timely management and prevention of COVID-19, without compromising the quality of output.