Scientific Reports (Apr 2024)

The influence of Gleason score ≤ 6 histology on the outcome of high-risk localized prostate cancer after modern radiotherapy

  • Hideya Yamazaki,
  • Gen Suzuki,
  • Koji Masui,
  • Norihiro Aibe,
  • Takuya Kimoto,
  • Kei Yamada,
  • Koji Okihara,
  • Fumiya Hongo,
  • Masayoshi Okumi,
  • Takumi Shiraishi,
  • Atsuko Fujihara,
  • Ken Yoshida,
  • Satoaki Nakamura,
  • Takashi Kato,
  • Yasutoshi Hashimoto,
  • Haruumi Okabe

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55457-z
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 1
pp. 1 – 9

Abstract

Read online

Abstract We aimed to retrospectively review outcomes in patients with high-risk prostate cancer and a Gleason score ≤ 6 following modern radiotherapy. We analyzed the outcomes of 1374 patients who had undergone modern radiotherapy, comprising a high-risk low grade [HRLG] group (Gleason score ≤ 6; n = 94) and a high-risk high grade [HRHG] group (Gleason score ≥ 7, n = 1125). We included 955 patients who received brachytherapy with or without external beam radio-therapy (EBRT) and 264 who received modern EBRT (intensity-modulated radiotherapy [IMRT] or stereotactic body radiotherapy [SBRT]). At a median follow-up of 60 (2–177) months, actuarial 5-year biochemical failure-free survival rates were 97.8 and 91.8% (p = 0.017), respectively. The frequency of clinical failure in the HRLG group was less than that in the HRHG group (0% vs 5.4%, p = 0.012). The HRLG group had a better 5-year distant metastasis-free survival than the HRHG group (100% vs 96.0%, p = 0.035). As the HRLG group exhibited no clinical failure and better outcomes than the HRHG group, the HRLG group might potentially be classified as a lower-risk group.

Keywords