Critical Care (Nov 2019)

A comparison of clinical paediatric guidelines for hypotension with population-based lower centiles: a systematic review

  • Nienke N. Hagedoorn,
  • Joany M. Zachariasse,
  • Henriette A. Moll

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2653-9
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 23, no. 1
pp. 1 – 10

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Different definitions exist for hypotension in children. In this study, we aim to identify evidence-based reference values for low blood pressure and to compare these with existing definitions for systolic hypotension. Methods We searched online databases until February 2019 (including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science) using a comprehensive search strategy to identify studies that defined age-related centiles (first to fifth centile) for non-invasive systolic blood pressure in healthy children 12 years. For children > 12 years, the definition of Parshuram’s early warning score agreed well, but the Advanced Paediatric Life Support definition was above the fifth centiles. Conclusions The different clinical guidelines for low blood pressure show large variability and low to moderate agreement with population-based lower centiles. For children 12 years, the Advanced Paediatric Life Support overestimates hypotension but Parshuram’s cut-off for hypotension in the early warning score agrees well. Future studies should focus on developing reference values for hypotension for acutely ill children.

Keywords