Zeitschrift für Medizinische Physik (Feb 2022)

Investigating the use of virtual 4DCT from 4DMRI in gated carbon ion radiation therapy of abdominal tumors

  • Giorgia Meschini,
  • Alessandro Vai,
  • Chiara Paganelli,
  • Silvia Molinelli,
  • Davide Maestri,
  • Giulia Fontana,
  • Andrea Pella,
  • Viviana Vitolo,
  • Francesca Valvo,
  • Mario Ciocca,
  • Guido Baroni

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 32, no. 1
pp. 98 – 108

Abstract

Read online

Purpose: To generate virtual 4DCT from 4DMRI with field of view (FOV) extended to the entire involved patient anatomy, in order to evaluate its use in carbon ion radiation therapy (CIRT) of the abdominal site in a clinical scenario. Materials and methods: The virtual 4DCT was generated by deforming a reference CT in order to (1) match the anatomy depicted in the 4DMRI within its FOV, by calculating deformation fields with deformable image registration to describe inter-fractional and breathing motion, and (2) obtain physically plausible deformation outside of the 4DMRI FOV, by propagating and modulating the previously obtained deformation fields. The implemented method was validated on a digital anthropomorphic phantom, for which a ground truth (GT) 4DCT was available. A CIRT treatment plan was optimized at the end-exhale reference CT and the RBE-weighted dose distribution was recalculated on both the virtual and GT 4DCTs. The method estimation error was quantified by comparing the virtual and GT 4DCTs and the corresponding recomputed doses. The method was then evaluated on 8 patients with pancreas or liver tumors treated with CIRT using respiratory gating at end-exhale. The clinical treatment plans adopted at the National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO, Pavia, Italy) were considered and the dose distribution was recomputed on all respiratory phases of the planning and virtual 4DCTs. By comparing the two datasets and the corresponding dose distributions, the geometrical and dosimetric impact of organ motion was assessed. Results: For the phantom, the error outside of the 4DMRI FOV was up to 4.5 mm, but it remained sub-millimetric in correspondence to the target within the 4DMRI FOV. Although the impact of motion on the target D95% resulted in variations ranging from 22% to 90% between the planned dose and the doses recomputed on the GT 4DCT phases, the corresponding estimation error was ≤2.2%. In the patient cases, the variation of the baseline tumor position between the planning and the virtual end-exhale CTs presented a median (interquartile range) value of 6.0 (4.9) mm. For baseline variations larger than 5 mm, the tumor D95% variation between the plan and the dose recomputed on the end-exhale virtual CT resulted larger than 10%. Median variations higher than 10% in the target D95% and gastro-intestinal OARs D2% were quantified at the end-inhale, whereas close to the end-exhale phase, limited variations of relevant dose metrics were found for both tumor and OARs. Conclusions: The negligible impact of the geometrical inaccuracy in the estimated anatomy outside of the 4DMRI FOV on the overall dosimetric accuracy suggests the feasibility of virtual 4DCT with extended FOV in CIRT of the abdominal site. In the analyzed patient group, inter-fractional variations such as baseline variation and breathing variability were quantified, demonstrating the method capability to support treatment planning in gated CIRT of the abdominal site.

Keywords