Clinical Epidemiology (Oct 2021)

Measuring Medication Adherence in a Population-Based Asthma Administrative Pharmacy Database: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • Asamoah-Boaheng M,
  • Osei Bonsu K,
  • Farrell J,
  • Oyet A,
  • Midodzi WK

Journal volume & issue
Vol. Volume 13
pp. 981 – 1010

Abstract

Read online

Michael Asamoah-Boaheng,1 Kwadwo Osei Bonsu,2 Jamie Farrell,1 Alwell Oyet,3 William K Midodzi1 1Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John’s, NL, Canada; 2School of Pharmacy, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John’s, NL, Canada; 3Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John’s, NL, CanadaCorrespondence: Michael Asamoah-BoahengFaculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John’s, NL, CanadaTel +1 7093513861Email [email protected]: Limited studies have systematically reviewed the literature to identify and compare the various database methods and optimal thresholds for measuring medication adherence specific to adolescents and adults with asthma. In the present study, we aim to identify the methods and optimal thresholds for measuring medication adherence in population-based pharmacy databases.Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (IPA), Web of Science, Google Scholar, and grey literature from January 1, 1998, to March 16, 2021. Two independent reviewers screened the studies, extracted the data, and assessed the quality of the studies. A quantitative knowledge synthesis was employed.Results: Thirty-eight (38) retrospective cohort studies were eligible. This review identified 20 methods for measuring medication adherence in adolescent and adult asthma administrative health records. Two measures namely the medication possession ratio (MPR) and proportion of days covered (PDC) were commonly reported in 87% of the literature included in this study. From the meta-analysis, asthma patients who achieved adherence threshold of “ 0.75– 1.00” [OR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.41 to 0.77] and “> 0.5” [OR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.54 to 0.94] were less likely to experience asthma exacerbation.Conclusion: Despite their limitations, the PDC and the MPR still remain the most common measures for assessing adherence in asthma pharmacy claim databases. The evidence synthesis showed that an adherence threshold of at least 0.75 is optimal for classifying adherent and non-adherent asthma patients.Keywords: medication adherence, adherence measures, asthma, adherence thresholds, meta-analysis, administrative health databases, review

Keywords