Retrospective review of treatment outcomes and costs in children with sleep disordered breathing assessed with multi-channel studies

Abstract

Current UK guidance on OSA management recommends only selective use of sleep studies - when there is diagnostic uncertainty, in children with comorbidities or to evaluate perioperative risk in those with suspected severe OSA. Routine use of sleep studies to confirm a diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) in children before adenotonsillectomy is not currently recommended. We report the findings of a novel paediatric sleep service based on routine use of multi-channel sleep studies (MCSS) before adenotonsillectomy and present the results of a service evaluation assessing the impact of our practise on treatment outcomes and cost.We conducted a retrospective study of 264 children with sleep disordered breathing seen in our centre between July 2018–June 2019, using medical records and a sleep study database to determine treatment outcomes and costs. Using responses from a questionnaire completed by otolaryngologists for a separate prospective study, we compare our costs with estimates of those associated with a standard UK model of care i.e. with selective use of sleep studies.We estimate that our routine use of MCSS reduced the number of adenotonsillectomies by 44 % but at higher monetary costs than those estimated for the standard model of care. We note however, that reconfiguring our service to arrange a sleep study before the initial appointment, rather than after, would result in the service being cost neutral compared with the standard model. We also estimate that use of home multi-channel studies in our service would bring a significant cost saving (∼£50,000 - £80,000 per annum) compared to standard care.