Frontiers in Oncology (Apr 2023)

A modified method for CT radiomics region-of-interest segmentation in adrenal lipid-poor adenomas: a two-institution comparative study

  • Hanlin Zhu,
  • Mengwei Wu,
  • Peiying Wei,
  • Min Tian,
  • Tong Zhang,
  • Chunfeng Hu,
  • Zhijiang Han

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1086039
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13

Abstract

Read online

ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate the application of modified region-of-interest (ROI) segmentation method in unenhanced computed tomography in the radiomics model of adrenal lipid-poor adenoma, and to evaluate the diagnostic performance using an external medical institution data set and select the best ROI segmentation method.MethodsThe imaging data of 135 lipid-poor adenomas and 102 non-adenomas in medical institution A and 30 lipid-poor adenomas and 43 non-adenomas in medical institution B were retrospectively analyzed, and all cases were pathologically or clinically confirmed. The data of Institution A builds the model, and the data of Institution B verifies the diagnostic performance of the model. Semi-automated ROI segmentation of tumors was performed using uAI software, using maximum area single-slice method (MAX) and full-volume method (ALL), as well as modified single-slice method (MAX_E) and full-volume method (ALL_E) to segment tumors, respectively. The inter-rater correlation coefficients (ICC) was performed to assess the stability of the radiomics features of the four ROI segmentation methods. The area under the curve (AUC) and at least 95% specificity pAUC (Partial AUC) were used as measures of the diagnostic performance of the model.ResultsA total of 104 unfiltered radiomics features were extracted using each of the four segmentation methods. In the ROC analysis of the radiomics model, the AUC value of the model constructed by MAX was 0.925, 0.919, and 0.898 on the training set, the internal validation set, and the external validation set, respectively, and the AUC value of MAX_E was 0.937, 0.931, and 0.906, respectively. The AUC value of ALL was 0.929, 0.929, and 0.918, and the AUC value of ALL_E was 0.942, 0.926, and 0.927, respectively. In all samples, the pAUCs of MAX, MAX_E, ALL, and ALL_E were 0.021, 0.025, 0.018, and 0.028, respectively.ConclusionThe diagnostic performance of the radiomics model constructed based on the full-volume method was better than that of the model based on the single-slice method. The model constructed using the ALL_E method had a stronger generalization ability and the highest AUC and pAUC value.

Keywords