Efficiency comparison of DNA extraction kits for analysing the cockle gut bacteriome

Abstract

Cockles play a vital ecological role and provide valuable ecosystem services globally. However, the performance, production, and safe consumption of cockles are significantly influenced by their gut-associated bacteriome. Accurate understanding of gut-bacteriome interactions, and surveillance of pathogenic bacteria loads in cockles, rely on efficient DNA extraction methods that yield high-quality and representative bacterial DNA. Despite this importance, reliable extraction methods for cockles are currently overlooked. Therefore, we evaluated the performance of five DNA extraction kits (E.Z.N.A.® Soil DNA; FastDNA® Spin; DNeasy PowerSoil Pro; QIAamp PowerFecal DNA; ZymoBIOMICS™DNA Miniprep) in terms of DNA quality, yield, bacterial community structure (analysed by using denaturating gradient gel electrophoresis; DGGE), and bacteriome composition (analysed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing) in Cerastoderma edule gut. The DNeasy kit provided the highest purity and quantity of bacterial DNA, while the PowerFecal and Zymo kits exhibited reduced extraction efficiency. DGGE profiles revealed significant variability between the tested kits (R = 0.512; mean P = 0.011), but the FastDNA kit under-represented the bacterial community in cockles’ gut. Based on alpha diversity, the DNeasy kit outperformed the others and successfully detected all abundant genera found with the alternative kits. Our findings indicate that the DNeasy kit is an efficient DNA extraction method, enabling a molecular representation of the gut-associated bacteriome in C. edule. These results contribute to the development of effective techniques for studying the cockle gut bacteriome and its ecological implications.

Keywords

• Cerastoderma edule
• DNA extraction
• DGGE
• NGS
• Bacterial community