A comment on a discriminatory decision

Abstract

AbstractThe underlying principle suggests that individuals typically navigate legal channels independently; however, circumstances may lead them to enlist authorized professionals, known as commentators, to handle legal procedures on their behalf. Despite this norm, the Court of Cassation adopted an unconventional stance, deeming commentary before chambers as a breach of public order. To better comprehend this divergence, an exploration into the Court's jurisprudence within the framework of legal texts is warranted.