Cancers (Jul 2019)

Prognostic Role of Androgen Receptor in Triple Negative Breast Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Study

  • Shristi Bhattarai,
  • Sergey Klimov,
  • Karuna Mittal,
  • Uma Krishnamurti,
  • Xiaoxian (Bill) Li,
  • Gabriela Oprea-Ilies,
  • Ceyda Sonmez Wetherilt,
  • Ansa Riaz,
  • Mohammed A. Aleskandarany,
  • Andrew R. Green,
  • Ian O. Ellis,
  • Guilherme Cantuaria,
  • Meenakshi Gupta,
  • Upender Manne,
  • Johnson Agboola,
  • Brett Baskovich,
  • Emiel A. M. Janssen,
  • Grace Callagy,
  • Elaine M. Walsh,
  • Anurag Mehta,
  • Atika Dogra,
  • Tanuja Shet,
  • Pooja Gajaria,
  • Tiffany Traina,
  • Haruna A. Nggada,
  • Abidemi Omonisi,
  • Saad A. Ahmed,
  • Emad A. Rakha,
  • Padmashree Rida,
  • Ritu Aneja

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11070995
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 7
p. 995

Abstract

Read online

Background: The androgen receptor (AR) has emerged as a potential therapeutic target for AR-positive triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, conflicting reports regarding AR’s prognostic role in TNBC are putting its usefulness in question. Some studies conclude that AR positivity indicates a good prognosis in TNBC, whereas others suggest the opposite, and some show that AR status has no significant bearing on the patients’ prognosis. Methods: We evaluated the prognostic value of AR in resected primary tumors from TNBC patients from six international cohorts {US (n = 420), UK (n = 239), Norway (n = 104), Ireland (n = 222), Nigeria (n = 180), and India (n = 242); total n = 1407}. All TNBC samples were stained with the same anti-AR antibody using the same immunohistochemistry protocol, and samples with ≥1% of AR-positive nuclei were deemed AR-positive TNBCs. Results: AR status shows population-specific patterns of association with patients’ overall survival after controlling for age, grade, population, and chemotherapy. We found AR-positive status to be a marker of good prognosis in US and Nigerian cohorts, a marker of poor prognosis in Norway, Ireland and Indian cohorts, and neutral in UK cohort. Conclusion: AR status, on its own, is not a reliable prognostic marker. More research to investigate molecular subtype composition among the different cohorts is warranted.

Keywords