Journal of Oral Microbiology (Jan 2021)

Performance of at-home self-collected saliva and nasal-oropharyngeal swabs in the surveillance of COVID-19

  • Paulo H. Braz-Silva,
  • Ana C. Mamana,
  • Camila M. Romano,
  • Alvina C. Felix,
  • Anderson V. de Paula,
  • Noeli E Fereira,
  • Lewis F. Buss,
  • Tania R. Tozetto-Mendoza,
  • Rafael A. V. Caixeta,
  • Fabio E. Leal,
  • Regina M. Z. Grespan,
  • João C. S. Bizário,
  • Andrea B. C. Ferraz,
  • Dipak Sapkota,
  • Simone Giannecchini,
  • Kelvin K. To,
  • Alain Doglio,
  • Maria C. Mendes-Correa

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/20002297.2020.1858002
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 1

Abstract

Read online

Background: SARS-CoV-2 quickly spreads in the worldwide population, imposing social restrictions to control the infection, being the massive testing another essential strategy to break the chain of transmission. Aim: To compare the performance of at-home self-collected samples – saliva and combined nasal-oropharyngeal swabs (NOP) – for SARS-CoV-2 detection in a telemedicine platform for COVID-19 surveillance. Material and methods: We analyzed 201 patients who met the criteria of suspected COVID-19. NOP sampling was combined (nostrils and oropharynx) and saliva collected using a cotton pad device. Detection of SARS-COV-2 was performed by using the Altona RealStar® SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR Kit 1.0. Results: There was an overall significant agreement (κ coefficient value of 0.58) between saliva and NOP. Considering results in either sample, 70 patients positive for SARS-CoV-2 were identified, with 52/70 being positive in NOP and 55/70 in saliva. This corresponds to sensitivities of 74.2% (95% CI; 63.7% to 83.1%) for NOP and 78.6% (95% CI; 67.6% to 86.6%) for saliva. Conclusion: Our data show the feasibility of using at-home self-collected samples (especially saliva), as an adequate alternative for SARS-CoV-2 detection. This new approach of testing can be useful to develop strategies for COVID-19 surveillance and for guiding public health decisions.

Keywords