The use of frozen embryos and frozen sperm have complementary IVF outcomes: a retrospective analysis in couples experiencing IVF/Donor and IVF/Husband

Abstract

Abstract Background The cryopreservation of sperm or embryos has been an important strategy in the treatment of infertility. Recently studies have revealed the outcomes after IVF (in vitro fertilization) treatment for single-factor exposure either to frozen sperm or embryos. Methods This retrospective study was to uncover the exposure to both frozen sperm and embryo effects using IVF/H (in vitro fertilization using husbands’ fresh sperm) or IVF/D (in vitro fertilization using donors’ frozen sperm) treatment. Results The results showed the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), live birth rate (LBR) and low birth weight rate (LBW) increased to 63.2% (or 68.1%), 61.1% (or 66.4%) and 15.8% (or 16.2%) after using frozen embryo transfer within Group IVF/H (or Group IVF/D). After using frozen sperm, the high-quality embryo rate (HER) increased to 52% and baby with birth defect rate (BDR) reduced to 0% in subgroup D/ET comparing to subgroup H/ET. While the fertilization rate (FER), cleavage rate (CLR), HER and multiple pregnancy rate (MUR) reduced to 75%, 71%, 45% and 9.2% in subgroup D/FET comparing to subgroup H/FET. Finally, our study found accumulative frozen gamete effects, including both sperm and embryos, led to the significantly increasing in the HER (p < 0.05), CPR (p < 0.001), LBR (p < 0.001) and LBW (p < 0.05) in subgroup D/FET comparing to subgroup H/ET. Conclusion The use of frozen embryos and frozen sperm have complementary IVF outcomes. Our findings highlighted the parent’s distinguished frozen effect not only for clinical studies but also for basic research on the mechanism of cellular response adaptations to cryopreservation.

Keywords

• Cryopreservation
• IVF outcome
• Sperm
• Embryo
• Accumulative effect